Toaru Kagaku no Railgun is the follow-up series to 2008/2009’s Toaru Majutsu no Index. The story focuses on Misaka Mikoto, or “railgun”, and her group of friends. If the show was done right it could’ve been a fantastic action thrill ride, but instead we’re left with a hodgepodge of mini stories with some occasional action. Off the top of my head I can think of two examples that I could do without: photography day and school festival day. I’m sure the studio knew the fame and following certain characters had and it’s not surprising such episodes exist, I just wish that kind of stuff was saved for something like DVD extras. When Railgun got down to business though it was a pretty fun ride. The action was large, in your face and provided some impressive visuals. Other than the rather lame cliched final battle this show gets a seal of action approval.
The cast of characters is a combination of old and new, and for the most part, works pretty well. Starting off I didn’t think I’d be able to handle the show since lead character Shirai Kuroko, voiced by Arai Satomi, had a fairly grating voice. It grew on me over time, and by the end felt completely natural. As for the two new main characters, Saten and Uiharu, it was really hit or miss. I liked Saten; some of the story arcs centered around her were enjoyable. I was disappointed, however, that her skill level of zero amounted to nothing, and should be taken to heart. I guess I expected there to be some special case as to why she was a zero. Uiharu, on the other hand, didn’t do it for me. First off that row of flowers in your hair is annoying. Secondly I found her personality to suck. It was a bit too whiny and really provided nothing special as far as I’m concerned. This especially came true for me near the end when she became sort of an uptight stubborn bitch.
Toaru Kagaku no Railgun does a fine job of being entertaining, but failed short of becoming a great show. Certain filler episodes and some weak characters held it all back. It also lacked one of the most enjoyable aspects of its predecessor, the Misaka/Touma arguments.
[7/10]
No comments:
Post a Comment